User research · Conversion optimisation
How we increased financing checkouts from 47% to 89% by changing where we introduced financing
A simple change in how we communicated affordability transformed how customers chose to pay for solar products on EnergyStack.
By Isaiah Adeleke · 2026
Before and after the EnergyStack redesign
Before
Original product details page · financing introduced at checkout
After
Redesigned product details page · financing visible while shopping
47% → 89%
Financing share of checkouts
+42pp
Increase after redesign
10%
Minimum upfront payment offered
Product: EnergyStack by Rivy · Role: Lead Product Designer · Focus: User Research, Conversion Optimisation, E-commerce UX
We had visitors, but not enough buyers
EnergyStack was an e-commerce platform we built at Rivy to help customers purchase solar products outright or through financing.
After launching, we started noticing something interesting. People were visiting the platform, browsing products, and exploring their options, but many weren't progressing to checkout.
We had a product discovery problem, and we needed to understand why.
So we conducted a UX and user research audit to identify where customers were dropping off and what might be preventing them from purchasing.
One insight stood out: Solar products were expensive, and affordability was a major barrier to purchase.
The interesting part? We already had a solution for that.
The solution was already there, just in the wrong place
Rivy offered financing that allowed customers to pay as little as 10% upfront and spread the remaining cost over several months.
But we'd made a critical design decision when building EnergyStack.
We introduced financing primarily at checkout.
Customers would browse products, add them to their cart, and only then discover that they could choose between paying outright or financing their purchase.
On paper, it made sense. Financing was a payment method, so we placed it where customers chose how to pay.
But we had overlooked something: customers who couldn't afford the full price weren't necessarily making it to checkout.
Someone browsing a solar inverter costing ₦2.3 million might leave immediately after seeing the price, without knowing they could start with approximately ₦230,000.
We were waiting until customers had decided to purchase before telling them something that could influence that decision.
Financing introduced at the end
- 01Homepage
- 02Product listing
- 03Product details
- 04Cart
- 05Checkout
- 06Financing option
At product details, customers see the full price, but may leave before discovering financing.
We needed to sell affordability, not just products
Our research changed how we thought about financing.
We had initially treated it as a payment option. But for customers purchasing expensive solar equipment, financing could be a key reason to consider buying.
That meant affordability needed to be communicated much earlier in the shopping journey.
We redesigned three key touchpoints.
Homepage: Make financing part of the first impression
Previously, the homepage focused on showcasing solar products.
We introduced financing-led promotional banners that communicated how customers could purchase products by paying just a fraction of the total cost upfront.
Instead of simply advertising a solar solution at its full price, we could communicate that customers could get started with as little as 10% upfront.
This meant customers understood that financing was available before they even started exploring products.
Homepage before and after
Before
Product-focused homepage without prominent financing messaging
After
Financing banners communicating the low upfront payment
Product details: Make affordability tangible
This was one of the most important changes.
Previously, customers saw the full product price and had to proceed to checkout before exploring financing.
We redesigned the product details page to display a financing breakdown specific to each product.
For example, instead of presenting only a solar installation priced at ₦2.3 million, customers could also see:
- Full price: ₦2,300,000
- Pay from: ₦230,000 upfront
- Spread the balance: Over the available financing period
These weren't generic financing promotions. The figures were contextual to the product customers were viewing.
Our goal was to help customers evaluate affordability while they were still deciding whether a product was within reach.
Product details financing redesign
Before
Original product price presentation
After
Upfront payment, product-specific financing breakdown, and financing call to action
Checkout: Keep both payment options
We didn't remove the original checkout experience.
Customers could still choose to pay outright or apply for financing.
The difference was that financing was no longer a surprise discovered at the end of the journey.
By the time customers reached checkout, they had already been introduced to the possibility of spreading payments.
Before
- 01Homepage
- 02Product details
- 03Cart
- 04Financing discovered at checkout
After
- 01Financing promoted on homepage
- 02Financing breakdown on product details
- 03Cart
- 04Checkout with financing or cash
What changed after the redesign?
Before the redesign, the checkout split was relatively balanced.
47% of checkouts selected financing, while 53% selected cash payments.
After introducing financing throughout the shopping journey, that changed significantly.
Financing grew to 89% of checkouts, a 42-percentage-point increase.
Before redesign
After redesign
+42 percentage points in financing's share of checkouts after the redesign.
This was an important outcome for EnergyStack because the platform was designed not only to sell solar products but also to create more opportunities for customers to access Rivy's financing.
The redesign helped make financing a more visible part of the purchase journey and was followed by a significant shift towards financing at checkout.
Note: This metric measures the proportion of checkouts choosing financing, not the overall visitor-to-purchase conversion rate.
What I learned: Sometimes the problem isn't your solution, but when you introduce it
This project changed how I think about communicating value in product experiences.
When we first designed EnergyStack, we positioned financing as a payment method because that was where it logically belonged in the transaction flow.
But our research helped us see it differently.
For someone who could afford a product outright, financing might simply be another payment option.
For someone who couldn't, financing could be the difference between considering a purchase and abandoning the idea entirely.
The value of financing wasn't limited to checkout. It was relevant from the moment customers started evaluating products.
The biggest lesson for me was simple: Don't wait until users reach the end of a journey to communicate something that could motivate them to begin it.
